Nipanimayu
When windsurfing or poppy drops some application, window pops up with a proposal to send this information to Microsoft, or, respectively, to Apple for review. Under FreeBSD, if the user is faced with mistake, he can say "send-pr" and send a problem report.
However, if I'm faced with a clear problem in Cisco / Juniper / Extreme, I should pay for it, to tell the manufacturer about problem. Even if my arms thrown iosom bark trapnuvshiysya dzhunosovy demon or a reproducible bug extreme. To me it is completely incomprehensible. It is not I need - if I have something not working, I'm not going to wait until the vendor fix bugs and release updates, it is unacceptable for me, I'll find another way to solve this problem so that more of this error is not encountered. And after that I can inform the vendor about the error (so that other users not stepping on the same rake), and I can not tell. Why prevent the vendors, so I reported it a bug? After all, it does not necessarily take the guarantee correction does not necessarily make bug reports available to the public - why not just give the opportunity to send bug reports?
If so did a vendor I would have thought that he had some quirk in the brain. But so do virtually everything, and that means something I do not understand.
Explain.
0 comments:
Post a Comment